Page 80 - Demo

THE LANDMARK CASES OF PROF. DR. YUSRIL IHZA MAHENDRA THE LANDMARK CASES OF PROF. DR. YUSRIL IHZA MAHENDRA572011. https://antikorupsi.id/id/article/kasus-sisminbakumkejagung-kesulitan-dakwa-yusril.Jacqueline S. Hodgson. %u201cSafeguarding Suspects%u2019 Rights in Europe.%u201d New Criminal Law Review 14, no. 4 (October 2011): 611%u201365. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2011.14.4.611.Julaiddin Julaiddin. %u201cAkses Mendapatkan Keadilan (Access to Justice) dalam Konstitusi Indonesia.%u201d UNES Law Review 2, no. 2 (January 2020): 137%u201343. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v2i2.68.Kardono, Muhammad Hatta, and Herinawati Herinawati. %u201cAnalisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Saksi Testimonium De Auditu (Studi Kasus Jinayat Nomor 7/Jn/2021/Ms Aceh).%u201d Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 11, no. 1 (June 2023): 74. https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v11i1.9145.Kisekka, Nakibuule Gladys. %u201cPlea Bargaining as a Human Rights Question.%u201d Cogent Social Sciences 6, no. 1 (January 2020): 1818935. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1818935.Kompas.com. %u201cYusril: Jaksa Tidak Relevan Nilai Saksi.%u201d Kompas.com, October 6, 2010. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2010/10/06/13163138/yusril-jaksa-tidak-relevan-nilai-saksi.K%u00f6rtv%u00e9lyesi, Zsolt. %u201cTranscending The Individual/Collective Minority Rights Divide: A Procedural Solution.%u201d International and Comparative Law Quarterly 71, no. 1 (January 2022): 73%u2013106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589321000464.Kristanto, Respati Bayu, and Hervina Puspitosari. %u201cKekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium De Auditu dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan terhadap Kesusilaan (Tinjauan Putusan Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN. Sby.%u201d UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (December 2023): 6653%u201364.Lasaka, Mustalim. %u201cIus Constituendum of Electronic Evidence Arrangement in Criminal Procedure Law.%u201d Jurnal Legalitas